Standing
This page includes a writing template for analyzing this topic and usage notes to guide its application. In general, the template is designed to serve as a starting point for your analysis. It should be adapted to fit the specific facts of your case and your professor’s preferences.
On this page:
Writing Template
Issue
I: The issue is whether Plaintiff has standing.
Analysis
R: To establish standing, a plaintiff must demonstrate they suffered (1) an injury in fact, (2) caused by the defendant, (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable court decision.
1. Injury in Fact
R: The injury must be both (a) concrete and (b) particularized.
a. Concrete
R: A concrete injury is one that is real and not abstract; it can be physical, economic, or non-physical (e.g., loss of aesthetic or recreational value). Thus, a mere violation of a statutory right, without more, is insufficient to constitute a concrete injury. In cases involving threats of future harm, the plaintiff must show the harm is actual and imminent, rather than speculative.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, Plaintiff’s injury [is/is not] concrete.
b. Particularized
R: An injury is particularized if it affects the plaintiff in a personal and individual way. General grievances shared by a large number of people or generalized concerns about the government’s compliance with the law are insufficient. However, where harm to public interests (e.g., environmental harm impairing their recreational or aesthetic enjoyment) specifically affects the plaintiff, the harm is particularized.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, Plaintiff’s injury [is/is not] particularized.
2. Causation
R: There must be a causal connection between the plaintiff’s injury and the defendant’s conduct. The injury must be “fairly traceable” to the defendant’s actions, rather than the result of independent actions by third parties not before the court. Speculative links between the conduct and injury are insufficient.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, Defendant’s conduct [caused/did not cause] Plaintiff’s injury.
3. Redressability
R: The plaintiff must demonstrate that it is “likely” (as opposed to merely speculative) that a favorable court decision will redress the injury. The remedy sought must directly address the harm alleged, and the court’s relief must have a tangible impact on the plaintiff’s condition or rights.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, Plaintiff’s injury [is/is not] redressable.
Conclusion
C: Therefore, since all of the elements are satisfied, Plaintiff has standing.
The template above is provided as a free sample. Get access to all templates by logging in or signing up.
More templates are in development! With a subscription, you will get (1) immediate access to all restricted templates that are displayed, providing a robust foundation for your legal writing needs; and (2) ongoing updates as new templates are released, expanding your resources over time.
Notes
JurisJotter templates synthesize legal principles into a practical format that supports the development of well-structured, point-rich analyses in a timed exam.
The template features (1) headers identifying the overall issue, analysis, and conclusion. If the analysis begins with an umbrella rule that identifies elements, factors, or steps of the analysis, it will be followed by subheaders that signpost the analysis of each component.
The template also features (2) IRAC labels at the beginning of each paragraph. These headers and labels are included for educational purposes, offering guidance on structuring your analysis. Your usage of the headers is optional but can be helpful to readers. We advise against including the IRAC labels in submitted work.
The templates serve as a general guide for writing and should be adapted to align with (1) your specific factual circumstances and (2) your professor’s preferences, particularly if your professor provides explicit formulations of rules or analyses. For example, you may add or subtract an element or modify its language. Regardless of whether your professor provides explicit formulations, (3) this template will assist you in crafting point-rich analyses.
Please note that these templates are writing aids and not finished products. They are efficiently designed for exam essays to demonstrate conceptual understanding; thus, they are not comprehensive outlines with historical context or dicta.
Questions or comments? Reach out at [email protected].